Primary Connections: Linking science with literacy
© State of Victoria (Department of Education, Employment and Training)

Graphing populations in food chains

Food pyramids
A simple food chain shows a feeding relationship between organisms (see also Eat and be eaten - Food chains)

eg. grass grasshopper field mouse snake owl

That is, grass is eaten by grasshoppers which in turn are eaten by mice which are eaten by snakes...

However, because the consumers at each level use some of the energy from the food they eat for movement, growth and other life functions, the amount of energy available for the next level in the food chain is reduced.

This effect is best shown as a food pyramid.

The following example of a food chain in the sea can be shown as the food pyramid below:

phytoplankton* shrimps fish penguin
*(microscopic plants)

At the base of the pyramid are the producers, or autotrophs. Above them are shown the heterotrophs: first the herbivores ("first order consumers") and then the various order carnivores (See also Eat and be eaten: Feeding relationships).

Generally, there are larger numbers of organisms at the earlier levels in food chains, and certainly the total weight of living matter (biomass) decreases at each successive step or "trophic level". This is because much of the energy gained from the eaten organisms has to be used for movement, growth and all other life functions.

Population graphing:
Predator - prey relationships. Over time, numbers in populations of organisms fluctuate.

Consider the case of mice and hawks. In good years when grain is plentiful, mice will breed often and successfully. Their numbers quickly increase (See graph above "Mice - hawks, population against time"). As the mice population increases, there are more easily-caught mice as prey for the predatory hawks. The hawk population will increase too, but slightly later than the increase in mice population. (Note: one hawk eats many mice, so the total numbers of hawks is always lower.)

More hawks eat more mice, so mice numbers drop. Mice become harder to catch, so hawk numbers drop too. With fewer predators, the mice can breed up again. The number of prey goes up and down, mirrored by the later rise and fall of predators. The time delay is related to the life cycle of the organisms.

Such a simplistic pattern is only seen in isolated areas (for example, on an island) as the picture is usually complicated by the availability of alternate food sources.